[OddjobAbe]

If you have a point, argue it for fuck sake, man. Don't pull out just because you feel uncomfortable with the subject.

It is my view that the holy folk in question are highly repressed individuals who are unable to cope with the conditions they are subject to (or in this case, more likely the conditions they are not subject to). The way they go about relieving this tension is wrong, and I think that other contemptible traits of theirs are responsible for this, thus I do not have much sympathy for these detestable individuals, but it has remained my belief for a long time that a contributing factor is the sexual repression in the Catholic church. It is not natural behaviour to abstain from sexual conduct, and few individuals are asexual, so it has to have some negative psychological consequences.

You may disagree with me, but I have believed for a long time that the manipulation of a person's beliefs regarding sex is a way of controlling a person. I don't know if that kind of repression started out as some primitive set of beliefs, but somewhere along the line (if not to begin with), it has been used as a device to control other human beings, since sex is a highly influential factor in human behaviour (in fact, behaviour of all living organisms, to my knowledge). It is these kinds of beliefs and the reasons I think they continue to exist which exemplifies why I believe that a secular state should totally abandon the sexual beliefs of the last fuck knows how many centuries/millennia.