:
|
Shame Laozi didn't actually exist.
|
That it is. 'He' gets the Jesus treatment as well.
Though someone or some group of philosophers were responsible for the body of work that is the Dao De Ching, which is fine by me.
It's not as if Laozi's existence is vital to the philosophy of Daoism (though arguably to the religion of Daoism which came afterwards) , unlike this Jesus fellow and his Christians.