:
|
This game, if history is anything to go on, will have a sub-par campaign with an unenjoyable multiplayer.
|
I've always enjoyed the campaign in Call of Duty (since MW1 anyway, haven't played CoD before that) because they aren't trying to make it some sort of military simulator. The guns have hardly any recoil, the characters are all super human soldiers who can drive any vehicle, use any weapon and survive 3 tank rounds to the face. And at the same time the game gives you the freedom to clear the way however you like. You can go head on or flank your enemies. But it's still a game and the makers treat it as such, which is good.
As for the multiplayer, I can enjoy the hell out of it. Because the guns have hardly any recoil, any match turns into a Rambo slugfest and that's awesome if you just feel like pulling the trigger and killing anything that moves. The fact that the multiplayer has been virtually unchanged since MW2 is what irritates me, especially because over 50% of people buy COD games soley for the multiplayer. I guess I have a bigger problem with people's stupidity than with the developers exploiting that stupidity.