I mean that if there's even one piece of evidence that seems to contradict the rest, at least the sentence should be reverted to a life sentence instead of the death penalty.
In the case of Troy there are multiple questionable pieces of evidence. No death penalty should be given unless the doubts surrounding those pieces of evidence have been cleared up.
In my book without a doubt means that the crime has been caught on camera for example, or by multiple DNA matches in the case of a serial rapist/murderer. Stuff like that. When things have to be assumed during a trial the death penalty should already be off the table.
__________________
The Oddworld Wiki
When one person suffers from a delusion it is called insanity. When many people suffer from a delusion it is called religion.
|