Just because a belief may not be as concrete or well-founded as yours does not make it any less valid. I don't think it's as much about indecisiveness as it is about feelings about identity, experiences with the religion itself and how much the person actually cares about religion.
Being an agnostic (noun) doesn't necessarily mean that they don't know their own mind. And tbh you saying that you have no time for agnostic people, it makes you sound a little pretentious.
:
|
Taking a stance of indecisiveness and arguing in favour for it smacks of the Golden Mean Fallacy.
|
But I don't think anyone should disregard it as a valid stance. In these sorts of debates all stances are valid and correct because they're all personal and individualised. However, some may be more fun in a debate than others.
I would say I lean alot more to the theist side than the atheist side, however I doubt the Christian church is for me because I have had alot of bad experiences with people who are Christian and there are some parts of the Bible that I don't agree with. I don't know really how a "personal God" or how interpretting the text as a metaphor actually affects the faith, and I don't agree with people picking and choosing the bits they do and don't like.
That said, I know very little about any other religion other than Buddhism.
- Rexy