:
|
Am I the only person who thinks religous arguments are stupid as shit?
-From Wikipedia
Science is discovering our universe and all existence and making rational conclusions based on what is most evident. Religion is something blindly follwed. So in an argument of logic any scientific teachings that contradict religious teaching would automatically be superior as science is something built around fact (not something made to counter religion).
I would have respect for a religious person if instead of trying to create bullshit arguments they said something along the lines of: "Though there is little evidence to support my belief I do not chose to believe just as you do not chose to disbelieve. Therefore I try please my deity."
|
I recognize science is mostly based on fact, and everything that can be proven, or have strong evidence to suggest that it is true is most likely true, the only parts of science I disagree with is things that havn't or can't be proven. which in the case of science isn't much, however science has been wrong in the past ( the earth is flat, everything revolves around earth) granted those examples were because of a lack of knowledge that we have now, but we may not have every bit of information now and could make mistakes, I think that most of what science sais is true, just that god was behind it all making sure it went well