:
|
There's the thing, though. You have defined cars specifically in a way to exclude scrapped cars. Have you defined people to specifically exclude or include foetuses? And on what basis?
|
i see what you mean, but what i meant by my previous post was that i don't think its a viable analogy. in short: no, i haven't defined people to include/exclude foetuses because i don't know enough about them. but i feel i
can define whether a car is a car on the basis of whether it does what it was intended to do because it is man-made. if it doesn't get you from A to B without exploding or breaking down, it is not a car. a foetus on the other hand is a natural process that will continue to grow, and this is what i feel contrasts too much with the analogy, which is why i don't think its a viable one. but this doesn't affect my view on abortion. i am still pro-choice.