:
|
Just one more thing; I always wondered why the heck did GTA IV get a 10 out of 10 in every damn review? It wasn't revolutionary or anything, it was a GTA game. The story is good and long enough to keep you interested, but it sure as hell wasn't anything special. Also, the multiplayer part of IV is pretty shitty really. In free mode, everyone keeps killing you with a helicopter since that's almost the only way to do it in free mode.
Whatever, I still like GTA IV and SR2, I really need to get into SR2 more.
/rant
|
1.Money
2.Free mode is fucking awesome, you played it wrong.
:
as pros. That's because people will always suck the dick that already has the most spit on it.
Don't get me wrong, I liked parts of RDR fine. It just felt like a waste of my time once I completed it. Literally like some waste-of-space Rockstar employee spitting on me then deminding I thank them for it.
Additionally, I thought it was an ugly game, but it took awhile. It was like having someone slowly throwing up poopy pusbarf in my eye over the course of a month, and I didn't realize it was happening until it was a solid crust on my face, sustaining a wet sublayer that leaked down my nose and into my esophagus. Then being hit by a book with a bad ending. That was RDR for me. Your mileage may vary, but it was a huge disappointment for me. I was all over the old west when I was younger, and then this fartsoup gets poured on me and every single person is telling me it was a masterpiece, or that (and seriously, WOW at this) that I don't 'get' it. What is there to get? That everything you do is pointless. That's all. Tell me otherwise, and I'll belittle you. It sucked for me. It was a waste of my time.
|
I'll agree that once I finished I was bored pretty quickly, but everything before that is amazing. Calling it an ugly game is also incorrect, since technically its still one of the best games out there. Also, it is a masterpiece, and you do not get it.