crazy Mr Smith's attitudes aside. what most people seem to be hootin' about is how this would affect those poor innocents in mid-long term frictional unemployment, while still completely disregarding those intending to stay on beneficiaries indefinitely.
and for a plethora of economic reasons, one couldn't just 'create manual labour jobs' for the dolemonkeys. do you think he even consulted anyone before spouting this jabber, how this would affect [or be separate from] the demand of labour etc?
|