It's not about who, it's about evidence. That's what would emerge from the free exchange of ideas unhindered by meaningless concerns. For example, Catholic dogma (and individual Catholics will choose whether or not to accept it, not all behave as automata on this stuff) demands that Eucharists actually change into the actual flesh of Christ. This is patently untrue, we can observe this. There is also the wonderful opportunity for ridicule in the implication that baked wheat goods are, upon the chanting of some magic words, a manifestation of their god. No one gets to tell me that that isn't hilarious.
__________________
| (• ◡•)| (❍ᴥ❍ʋ)
|