:
|
Yeah, but it was 1902. People were impressed with moving pictures in general back then, regardless of what it was. For fuck's sake, they were experimenting with a brand new medium. You can't apply that to the films of today.
|
This, to an extent.
:
|
So where does the Nightmare on Elm Street remake stand in all of this?
|
It doesn't, really. The fact that Robert Englund isn't even on board speaks volumes. There's a solid difference between someone having a go at a remake, and someone looking to line their pockets with a money making franchise while calling it a remake.
:
|
What IS lack of story? What IS good acting?
|
Avatar/Not Avatar. I get that you're trying to troll me, and I could almost respect that if you weren't doing such a horrible job.