[Dipstikk]

In my world, "freedom of speech" would be earned based on how fucking stupid you prove not to be and any abuses of it would result in that "freedom" being taken away. Say you use it to spread supremacist bile over a minority group, like the Westboro Church does with homosexuals. Bam, done, and god help you if you do it again. Minor punishments would be doled out to people who are just too vapid or stupid to successfully add to a discussion.

Additionally, walking into a bustling discussion and trying to tell people that "this is stupid, why are you thinking so hard? I'm bored. This is boring. You're boring!" Instant death sentence.

But that would be incredibly fascist and unsuccessful, and I'd never get to chime in about anything, so never mind. I don't like the idea behind the whole "MY WORD IS LAW" concept anyway because I'm not qualified to make laws and I'm also a bitter asshole.

I just think the talking should be left to the people who know a lot about what they're talking about, and that people who either chip in with "yah that's like... you know... *smacks gum*... fuck them, okah?" (EXAMINE YOUR FUCKING PERSPECTIVE OR GTFO) or people whose organized venom actually hurts others socially should be left faaaar out of the conversation.

But that could also open a whole mess of problems for people who think of new, valid perspectives on things. Like I said, fascist and unsuccessful.