:
Wouldn't it be more logical to let paedo's to get off to something that didn't harm a child whatsoever instead of banning everything? I mean, paedophiles with nothing to get off to would just be more compelled to start looking for little girls which causes even more damage. It seems like such an absolute waste of time.
|
The worry might be that if you allow one thing, it might lead to the other. Like anti-drug campaigners who claim that marijuana is a gateway drug to harder things.
:
You'd think that any legal company selling pictures of models can provide a picture ID of the person to prove they are 18+. In fact, I believe that's required by law for just about any modeling agency, not just adult ones.
|
But it's not about the risk that the person might be underage, it's the risk that a paedophile might, potentially, possibly act as if the person is underage.
:
Yes, but attempting to control people doesn't solve the issue, it merely sweeps it under the rug.
|
Agreed.