On the Panel last night, it said that if an Areoplane hit a builing in Australia, that chances are it wouldn't have fallen over. Why, because in Australia, they don't make the majority of the building out of steel, but concrete. And because concrete can withstand fire more than steel, it wouldn't melt. And if this did happen on a cement building, the plane wouldn't of went into the building but more smashed against it.
And why didn't they use cement in the WTC and other buildings??? Because the Mafia owned the concrete business and it was really expensive to buy. So they used steel because it was cheeper
__________________
When if doubt, stop and think... "What would Warney do?"
|