One of the largest moral brainteasers of all time is trying to decide whether or not unstable people are "Guilty" of their crimes or not. I was under the impression for the longest time that diminished responsibility made a person more innocent than they may seem at first.
But I've heard of several scenarios where people who are classified as having certain conditions who are still Technically guilty becuase they have "Just enough" free will. I really don't know enough about the subject to take a side. But it's still a pretty big mindfuck.
__________________
Arise O Man in thy strength. The kingdom is thine to inherit!
|