:
You can't be good for the animal by killing it, that's a fucking paradox no matter how many bends and turns you try to twist it in. It's a bit like saying 'Hey, you've got a fever. Maybe a bullet to the head will fix it.
|
In that case, perhaps pets who suffer from uncurable afflictions should be spared the bullet or injection and left to live in agony, you know, seeing as killing the animal does no good whatsoever.
I would hunt an animal unarmed for the sake of eating it and putting it's pelt to use. Hell, I'd tear it's throat out. And be shunned by society for not using a gun, no doubt. And then more than likely be arrested for charges of causing unnecessary suffering to an animal. I should think a gun is quicker and more humane than beating a deer over the head with a fucking rock until it stops twitching.