Yeah but you could ask yourself where do we draw the line when it comes to the majority being pissed off? Of course people are going to be pissed off but for the greater good of our species and our planet I would have to say ignore the majority. Any action shouldn't be taken overnight of course. But people should be made aware that having 4 kids in each household is not something we can get away with for much longer. What's wrong with 2 anyway?
T-nex: Not having any children wouldn't be that good of an idea since it would create an immense generation gap when we start having children again 10 to 15 years later or whatever. But restricting households to only 1 or 2 children would be a step in the right direction, especially when I still hear about people having 6 children or 10 or 12 or even 16 children. Not to mention that those children each cost money (not just the parents, everyone). So in a way it would even help the economy.
__________________
The Oddworld Wiki
When one person suffers from a delusion it is called insanity. When many people suffer from a delusion it is called religion.
|