View Single Post
  #386  
08-12-2009, 06:55 AM
Mac Sirloin's Avatar
Mac Sirloin
Less worse
 
: Aug 2006
: Exquisite Squalor
: 5,657
Blog Entries: 301
Rep Power: 27
Mac Sirloin  (7645)Mac Sirloin  (7645)Mac Sirloin  (7645)Mac Sirloin  (7645)Mac Sirloin  (7645)Mac Sirloin  (7645)Mac Sirloin  (7645)Mac Sirloin  (7645)Mac Sirloin  (7645)Mac Sirloin  (7645)Mac Sirloin  (7645)

:
Yay! OANST video! I can die happy now!

And I don't Kastere ever made a longer post.

Anyhoo Kastere, while I agree with the general idea of your post there are some things I should point out. First of all, I don't know any zoophile that would ever touch any animal sexually until it is sexually mature and actually capable of receiving (or having, whatever) sex from/with a human being. Sex with a very small dog is not done because it would hurt them, for instance.

I understand it must be kind of annoying to breed dogs, take care of them, watch them grow up and by the end of the day you sit down at your computer, read this thread and realize that some people buying those dogs could be doing so to have sex with them when they grow up. I mean, you don't breed these dogs so people can have sex with them, I think that if I was in your place I'd be pissed off too. But what you should also realize is that the animals a zoophile keeps and loves often get extremely good treatment because he/she is a zoophile. The animal get all kinds of luxury no dog in a normal family would ever get, no matter if the dog wants to have sex or not. Being a zoophile is about more then just sex. It's a love for animals first, sex second. Therefor no real zoophile out there would ever mistreat any animal in any way. A real zoophile would not buy a dog just for the sex, he would not have sex with a premature dog, he would not force a dog into sex and most important of all, he would treat the dog like anyone else would treat their wive or husband, which can only be a good quality IMO.

And of course there are disgusting fuckers out there who sneak into a shed and violate horses with broomsticks (true story) or tie a dog down to have sex with the poor thing until the end of time against it's will. But you can't compare people like that with 'regular' (for lack of a better term) zoophiles. For all intents and purposes, that would be like comparing child molesters to normal people. They both have sex with other people, only one is wrong and one is not.

There is also no denying that dogs actually can enjoy sex with humans. I've seen plenty of cases where male dogs are excited to be allowed to mount his 'partner' again. Heck, some dogs even get a tad aggressive because they want to have sex NOW!
Same goes for female dogs, plenty of them will at some point beg for sex.

I won't blame anyone who is morally opposed to this because it's not natural or because they find it disgusting. But in a lot of cases there is nothing abusive about zoophilia at all so that shouldn't be a reason to hate it.

EDIT: And to make this post more insteresting, I found the OANST video blooper reel .

Wow, your entire point falls apart with the word 'annoying'.

Fuck you, Havoc.
__________________
I see you jockin' me.