Oh, but I did read your post with care. The point is that it wasn't exactly worth commenting. And no, I do know fuck all about software development. You don't need to know everything about software development to know enough about it to get the general gist. So if you'd read Nate's post with care, you would have realised that he didn't imply that you did say that 100% of the bugs should be removed before release. His point was that the game was stable enough to be commercially acceptable.
__________________
A man walks into a zoo. There's nothing there but one dog. It was a shih-tzu.
|