Well, that was a lot of writing. There were a few facts in there, a few suppositions, a few theories, and a few blatant lies... I will now attempt to sift through it and separate them...
:
|
I have found absolutely no facts about the Universe's creation, and no proof about it, either.
|
The second part of this statement is true. The first part isn't: It is a fact that Microwave Background Radiation exists. It is a fact that the observed concentration of elements in the Universe matches that predicted by the theory of Big Bang Nucleosynthesis. It is a fact that other galaxies can be observed to be moving away from ours,
a la Hubble Expansion. Whereas none of these can be accepted as
Proof of the Big Bang, they are undeniably
Evidence. These two terms have become muddled throughout this topic, and I have to thank you for unpicking them...
:
|
The Universe exists, and it exists in 11 dimensions. The first three of these deal with space, the fourth deals with time, and all the others deal with the dimensions of sub-atomics. Therefore, our plane of existance is a physical one that actually exists. That is a fact (real basics here).
|
I'm not sure what word to assign this. 'Bullshit' doesn't quite fit, but it'll have to do. The fact is that there are only 5 dimensions that have been proven to exist: 4 of Space, 1 of Time. Further Dimensions have been postulated, but then some scientists have counted up to 124, so there is no real reason to choose any figure between 6 and 124... It's generally adequate to stick to the proven 5...
:
|
I've heard, here in fact, 'theory' described as an offered proof to a fact. Well...sort of. A theory is an idea offered that has not yet been prooven (prooved?), whether it be to describe facts, or whether it just be a cool idea you have.
|
What?
:
|
So, here we are, we have a Universe (ours, coincidently enough) which exists. This is the 'fact' of the arguement. It is not actually a fact because a fact operates on an abstract level. More on stuff like that later.
|
Not only is this nonsensical, but you did not give us "more on this later"...
:
|
So, here we are, we have a Universe which exists. This is the 'fact', and we are assuming that it was created somehow. Remember that that too is just an assumtion. I could branch out into the ouroboral existance of God here, and use offered proof for his existance to disproove him, but then I'd never finish this paragraph.
|
The old 'Babel Fish' Conundrum, eh?
Personally, I suspect that the use of a posh word like "ouroboral" here was an attempt to seem knowledgeable...
The rest of what you said was true, but could have been said in a much less longwinded way. Like this:
We have no proof of the Big Bang theory, but we have a lot of evidence.
I can't wait for part two... *rubs his hands*