:
Originally posted by PinkHaired Mudokon CWR:
If you read the bible very carefully, then you would see how everything was created.
|
We're not talking about the bible's "answers", we're talking about the bible's questions.
Evidence #1
There are no transitional links and intermediate forms in either the fossil record or the modern world. Therefore, there is no actual evidence that evolution has occurred either in the past or the present.
That is false science. There are transitional forms in the fossil record, whoever composed this was dishonest. For example, Archaeopteryx is a transitional form showing the link between bird and reptile.
Evidence #2
Natural selection (the supposed evolution mechanism, along with mutations) is incapable of advancing an organism to a "higher-order".
Poor use of terminology to communicate an erroneous concept. Natural selection combined with mutations are precisely what drives evolution.
Evidence #3
Although evolutionists state that life resulted from non-life, matter resulted from nothing, and humans resulted from animals, each of these is an impossibility of science and the natural world.
No they are not.
Evidence #4
The supposed hominids (creatures in-between ape and human that evolutionists believe used to exist) bones and skull record used by evolutionists often consists of `finds' which are thoroughly unrevealing and inconsistent. They are neither clear nor conclusive even though evolutionists present them as if they were.
The lineage of man and the apes is not complete, with many fossilised subspecies of human breaking off into myriads of branches. At present we don't know for sure if many were new groups branching off the same line we descended from (Neanderthal for example) whom we share a common ancestor with, or if they sit directly in our lineage (Australopithecus Afarensis, Lucy I believe). But there is no doubt about it that many of these fossils show the transition between man and ape.
Evidence #5
Nine of the twelve popularly supposed hominids are actually extinct apes/ monkeys and not part human at all.
This statement needs elaboration as well as back-up.
Evidence #6
The final three supposed hominids put forth by evolutionists are actually modern human beings and not part monkey/ ape at all. Therefore, all twelve of the supposed hominids can be explained as being either fully monkey/ ape or fully modern human but not as something in between.
What a load of bullshit. As with the previous statement, it needs elaboration as well as back-up.
Evidence #7
Natural selection can be seen to have insurmountable social and practical inconsistencies.
Errmmm, no. Social inconsistencies? Please explain. Practical inconsistencies?
Evidence #8
Natural selection has severe logical inconsistencies.
List them. There are no logical inconsistencies in evolution. It obeys natural law.
Evidence #9
The rock strata finds (layers of buried fossils) are better explained by a universal flood than by evolution.
Nonsense.
I don't even know why I bothered responding to this "evidence." To call these statements evidence is hysterical. I'm embarassed.
By the way, creation "science" is flawed as it approaches a problem with a result already determined.