:
Originally posted by PinkHaired Mudokon CWR:
Here's some evidence that evolution is false. I have more pointing on the bible. Here's what Creationist scientist stated:
Evidence #1
There are no transitional links and intermediate forms in either the fossil record or the modern world. Therefore, there is no actual evidence that evolution has occurred either in the past or the present.
Evidence #2
Natural selection (the supposed evolution mechanism, along with mutations) is incapable of advancing an organism to a "higher-order".
Evidence #3
Although evolutionists state that life resulted from non-life, matter resulted from nothing, and humans resulted from animals, each of these is an impossibility of science and the natural world.
Evidence #4
The supposed hominids (creatures in-between ape and human that evolutionists believe used to exist) bones and skull record used by evolutionists often consists of `finds' which are thoroughly unrevealing and inconsistent. They are neither clear nor conclusive even though evolutionists present them as if they were.
Evidence #5
Nine of the twelve popularly supposed hominids are actually extinct apes/ monkeys and not part human at all.
Evidence #6
The final three supposed hominids put forth by evolutionists are actually modern human beings and not part monkey/ ape at all. Therefore, all twelve of the supposed hominids can be explained as being either fully monkey/ ape or fully modern human but not as something in between.
Evidence #7
Natural selection can be seen to have insurmountable social and practical inconsistencies.
Evidence #8
Natural selection has severe logical inconsistencies.
Evidence #9
The rock strata finds (layers of buried fossils) are better explained by a universal flood than by evolution.
|
1.yes there are there are several known members of the genus homo(latin for man you sicko's)
2. there is no such thing as a "higher organism" we are exactly as high as an ameoba or any other animal plant protista fungus or bacteria
3. life can result from non life seeing as life is non life there is nothing that seperates us from the animals and matter was there it was just in something really really small
4.what do you mean inconclusive tell me one reason why they are inconclusive
5. news flash were apes that walk on two legs and like to build stuff you can't just say their just say their apes and call that an argument
6. I cannot be called "fully human" because there is no defining point and there is no such thing as fully (I asume your talking about cro magnum man neandrathal man and homo erectus which are different (we are cro magnum I believe))
7. what social inconcistancys they aren't different from everyone else if thats what you mean because everyone else is dead.
8.what logic inconcistancies? are there more then a supreme being apeard and started making things?
9. no because if there was a flood most of the fossils would be ruined.
[ December 31, 2001: Message edited by: Steve ]