Pinkhaired, there really is no point in arguing with you, as you refuse to admit to a PROVEN FACT. You say you support your argument with facts, but when I looked over it, I couldn't find one single thing remotely resembling a fact that supported your argument. So if you say you supported your argument with facts, why don't you be so kind as to copy and paste them?
Sidney, however, DID support his argument with facts, which you refuse to believe. Your argument has gotten so desperate that it has reached the point where you go so far as to say, "A long time ago, people thought the earth was flat, but it wasn't, so humans are not animals." This is by far the WORST argument for something that I have ever heard in my life. While you're at it, why not just go on to argue that the hoki fish is not a fish?
Humans are mammals. Mammals are animals. Therefore, humans are animals. Also, as Sidney said before (I copied and pasted this), animals are any multicellular organism of the kingdom animalia, differing from plants in certain typical characteristics such as capacity for locomotion, nonphotosynthetic metabolism, pronounced response to stimuli, restricted growth, and fixed bodily structure. Also, as Sidney said before, we fit this description.
Pinkhaired, we could probably get ten biologists to tell you that humans are animals and you still wouldn't believe it. We could show you solid proof, including the definition of animal, that humans are animals, and STILL you wouldn't believe us. *cough*stubborn*cough* But then you expect us to believe that humans are not animals, when all you have is that God did not mention it at the beginning of time, and that people thought the earth was flat a long time ago.
I'm sorry, Pinkhaired, but YOU ARE WRONG.
|