:
|
Am I not the only one to have?
|
That's a negative, Cap.
:
|
Which will almost certainly be a more long winded version of that simple statement, not saying that a fully scientific explanation isn't preferable but that simple statement coincides with twin studies, observable reactions, case studies and certain neurological stories.
Also the law of Parsimony almost guarantees my being right, unless of course Religion is right.
|
It's not the only plausible statement that fits. I'm not saying you are wrong or that I disagree that it could be the case, I've suggested it many times before. But there simply isn't the evidence or explanatory theory to make such a claim with that level of certainty, that's all.