:
|
I dunno if it was really necessary for him to kill them... he could have shot them in the kneecaps and waited for the cops.
|
With a shotgun? He'd have no leg left and the other one would have had a clear opportunity to attack him.
I agree with Nate, this guy looks like a wannabe vigilante, two aspects of this case I find very confusing though; firstly the fact that he shot at least one man in the back and secondly the 911 call itself is either reported on weirdly or he actually had the phone to his ear when he shot the men. In the end though, the law is there to protect the individual, not provide an excuse for bloodshed, the man is guilty for either shooting two men who were running from him or being retarded enough to put himself in a situation where his life was threatened by them.