:
|
You are a valued member of this society. Keep up the good work.
|
I think the main two problems with the rape thread was that it could have been construed to be a deliberately controversial thread, made for the sake of laughing at peoples reactions (At which point it would become a flame war and need to be closed) or a spam thread (And given your last two threads this would not have surprised me) which it became.
Also as a side note; where the fuck do personal attacks into Max's social life come into this? I did a quick comparison of MF's profile and postbit compared to that of banned members (Codek, Dino) and noticed that banned members have NO rep power and their posts cannot be repped, MF does not fit either category so I would assume he isn't banned.
Argumentum ad Hominum: a personal attack on the opposition instead of attacking his argument. This fallacy of logic makes it look like you have no decent counter argument against Max.
:
|
And you should know by now... Anything coming from Oanst, shouldn't be taken seriously...
|
So he should be excused for all he does, purely on the basis it isn't vindictive?