If an object has observable height, length, and width, you would infer that it is three dimensional, and thus there are three spatial dimensions large enough for us to perceive. And yet despite events having a duration, you refuse to accept that this implies a dimension along which this duration runs. I can’t really argue against that idea. Hell, I came up with it myself a few years ago when I said something like ‘I don’t time is an actual thing; I think it’s just something we came up with to explain why stuff happens.’ Can’t argue with that, but then you can’t argue against the validity of solipsism, but good luck genuinely believing it.
|