Look seriously super munch, I think that the OT is more stories which are based off truths, and meanings are true, and this is controversial, but I think the Jewish writers may have changed it to be in their favour, because they claim to be the chosen people of God, yet Jesus claims that God loves everyone, becuase we are all his creation.
Also, the Jews don't beleive in the NT, don't they denounce it at sermourns?
So that explains the sudden rift, the OT was written by those in the times of the heavy jewish leaders, or pharasies influence, whilst the NT was written in the time, when, thanks to Jesus, they saw what was realy going on.
And as Bullet Magnet said, he's not supposed to have a sexualality, the reason he's hetro, and not homo sexual, is because it does not contribute to our growth since we can only mate with those of the opposite sex, and sex she be done without lust, so if you were to have sex with someone of the same sex, then you would be doing so only for the sake of lust, I guess you could include love aswell, but it's leading you down to lust anyways.
Lust is one of the 7 deadly sins, Jesus is without sin, as is God, and the holy spirit and therefore they form a trinity, and cannot forsaque to sin like we cannot resist to do
And the whole point of him sacrificng, is that he is God's son, and is without sin, since it is not his punishment to bear (Those who sin, are punnished with death), so only he can take it from us, as he did.
And that is why Jesus Christ cannot be homosexual, or bisexual, and maybe even hetrosexual.
So if Jesus was anything, he was hetrosexual, or simply, not interested in sex. But being Hetrosexual would best unite him with the average man, and he realy can't be human without a sexuality, or at least I think so.
Now that would explain all of the critism against this, we;ll see how the play works out. Most likely, the reader is just interested in media attention, due to the fact that he's such a controversial issue.
__________________
|