I've noticed something.
The people who don't believe tend to demand evidence, and when they get it, they just plain deny it as fake.
See, now, it's this kind of thing that p
isses me off.
Now granted, a lot of things are obviously fake (I.E. 9/11, David Blaine, Bush's credibility, etc.) but
some things aren't blatantly fake.
This is where evidence against psionics seem to falter. It's usually either strings, or some ridiculous and probably improbable method.
Usually, not always.