View Single Post
  #61  
11-19-2007, 06:13 PM
Disgruntled Intern's Avatar
Disgruntled Intern
Faerie-Digesting Tachyon
 
: Dec 2001
: Port Orchard, Washington
: 3,506
Blog Entries: 41
Rep Power: 28
Disgruntled Intern  (4322)Disgruntled Intern  (4322)Disgruntled Intern  (4322)Disgruntled Intern  (4322)Disgruntled Intern  (4322)Disgruntled Intern  (4322)Disgruntled Intern  (4322)Disgruntled Intern  (4322)Disgruntled Intern  (4322)Disgruntled Intern  (4322)Disgruntled Intern  (4322)

This just seems similar to PETA nuts throwing blood on people wearing fur.

Sure, it makes a point, but at what cost? Although I'm all for the freedom of choice, people also have the right to choose whether or not they want to share space with semi-nude women. As it has been said, breasts always have been considered a sexual part of a woman's anatomy, and no matter how many bare-breasted women there are at the neighborhood pool, they always will be. It's genetic, friends.

This just seems like another "two steps forward, two steps back" situation. If women want to lounge around in public nude, or even semi-nude, there are certainly places to do so. These broads just sound like a bunch of attention seeking retards...Not feminists.

Feminists have bigger fish to fry.
__________________




Buy my T-shirts. People will like you more and I will hate you less.

Reply With Quote