Actually, Creationism technically is a science, or sciences and religeon can be grouped together, as they are both explanations we use to explain.
Actually, we accept that nearly all science we know is wrong, in fact, that's the point, we keep on trying to get closer to the truth, by presenting more accurate theories with our increasing technoligies.
Take ancient science, when they thought the earth was the center of the galaxy/ universe, technically this was influenced by religeon (Even though it is never mentioned in the bible, so then again, technically it isn't) , but it was still science, and as proved, wrong, yet they thought and believed it was right at the time.
I don't think the theory of evolution is a complete load of crap, maybe mostly crap, but not completly, and that's becuase in how diverse things have become, how things have such design, and yet the similarites are astonishing with say a dolphin to a shark (You could say this is becuase they have adapted, but becuase the process is random, then why the hell are they so alike? Shouldn't there be much more different forms that are just as efficient).
For me the theory of evolution is full of wholes, like the theory that the universe can fold and through worms wholes we can go through the middle, the big bang theory has a few holes, but it seems more believable than the other previous two theories.
Never the less, I believe God created the universe, he could of created the big bang, and is behind the evolution and such, but I just can't believe this is all random.
Oh, and Science still hasn't come up with an answer on how to create life, and seems very far off, so Religeon is as real as Science if not more IMO.
Even if it did, that wouldn't even prove that our Religeons (Well Christianity, I'm not going to speak for the others ones becuase I don't know them that well) would be false.
__________________
|