:
|
My point, which I couldn't be bothered actually expressing in my last post, was that scientists over the world believe that the strings exists and will fight for the theory despite the fact that it's actually impossible to prove.
|
Technically everything is impossible to prove. String "theory" is difficult to test. When they fight for it, that is debate within the scientific community, which are very common and almost always heated. You should see botanists debating the reclassification of a single species into a new genus, whoo-boy.
:
|
There may not be direct evidence but there's plenty of indirect evidence. Findings of dinosaurs, cave paintings, other sets of skeletons, all indicate that species developed over the course of years.
|
There is direct evidence. We have actually observed species evolving into new ones.
:
|
Besides, if religion is scientific enough to be taught in schools then science is spiritual enough to be taught in church.
|
I would so go to that church (it would be better than that school).
:
|
Even if science one day can proof with facts that the big bang is how it all started...
|
We can't prove anything, but we do have those facts. How do you think we came up with the theory in the first place?
:
What if one of those kids grows up to be a homicide detective? 
|
"Well Chief Inspector, I don't yet have the evidence I need to crack the case, so I propose Santa Claus came down the chimney and did it."