As has been said, censoring is pointless, more sites would merely crop up, it would be far better to go to the web owners and order it's closure instead, rather than censoring. The site would still be there, and people could find a way through it anyway to look at the site if they wanted to.
Surely the internet is free and open to everyone? What right do the police have to censor things? (though maybe there ought to be a limit somewhere) The internet is open to all people, there are pretty much no bars holding it down, so how can anyone have the right to say what should and shouldn't be allowed? If you don't want to look at something in particular, don't. It's the consumer's choice, no one else's. The internet provider made the right call here.
|