First of all, I would like to thank you for finally answering the question I have been asking for months.
Secondly, I have answered every question you have asked of me before.
Now, on to the good stuff....
I would love to dissect your evidence piece by piece, but there is one overriding flaw in your argument, and that is really all I need to point out to invalidate everything you've said.
Your argument is based upon one lone assumption: that the Universe was made. This in itself is an incredible leap to make. After all, not everything that exists was made. It is common knowledge, for example, that Mountains are raised by Plate Tectonics, not by an intelligent force. The same could [and probably does, in my opinion] apply to the Universe.
However, to flesh out this post, and really give you something to aim at when you get your Random Insult Launcher out, I will elaborate, and run down various other reasons why I think you are wrong:
:
Rule 1:
"For everything made, there is a maker"
|
True, but as I have already pointed out, the Universe was not 'made'. It came into existence.
:
Rule 2:
A power by itself, unless mastered by intelligence, could destroy instead of building. A power needs directions and control by an intelligent person to make it useful.
|
Of course Natural Forces can destroy, but they can also build. Intelligent Forces can also both build and destroy. What's your point?
:
Rule 3:
Beauty needs feelings. Without feelings there is no beauty.(1) To have a feeling, you need a person.(2)
|
Whoa... There's a lot of stuff to say about this one... 1) Beauty can exist independantly of Observation. Something is still beautiful, even if it has never been seen, and has therefore never aroused feelings. 2) Animals also feel. 3) What does this have to do with anything we've been talking about?
:
Rule 4:
There should be a first maker.
|
See what I said about Rule 1? Same applies here...
:
Rule 5:
In the beginning was a very intelligent being who put together the atom.
|
See just about everything I have ever posted to see why this is not necessarily true...
The "Rules" after that just get ridiculous, so I will refrain from comment on them. I will instead move on the the main bodies of text:
:
|
you will not believe someone who tells you that the complicated computer you are using now is made by a chance or by the nature! It will never happen.
|
No, but nobody's claiming that it is. But that is because it is incredibly unlikely that atoms would ever spontaneously form into a computer. It is, however, far more likely, especially given the conditions of the early Universe, that subatomic particles would form into atoms, then into molecules. It's all about Probability.
:
|
Think about something as big as a planet, or as small as a bacteria or about one function in human body or a mountain. Apply the above, common sense, rules to it. Think about what it takes to make it?
|
See above. It's all about Forces and Probability. Besides, if our planet had formed any differently, we would have different veiws as to what Beauty is, NOT the other way round...
:
|
It is amazing to listen to scientists when they are making an experience and trying to understand all the factors that could affect the chemical reaction, for example, and try to control one factor at a time to reach a controlled experience. So, they admit that there are stable materials, and there are factors, and to make any intelligent changes you have to study hard and to make hard choices, and sometimes they can predict the end-result product. Some do all that in the laboratory, but when it comes to a discussion like ours they insist that nature made everything! How it could be my beloved scientist? If you, with all your intelligence and understanding, spend years trying to control the experience’s environment, how could you imagine that without any controlling the nature formed everything. We are dealing at the basis now, at the atom level, would it make sense that there should be an intelligent being who without any materials, at the time of beginning, formed the first component of a material, the atom. Don’t you agree with me that such a person has a great knowledge of all powers that exist in the universe? Don’t you think that intelligent being is so genius that he made the whole universe just out of these few components of atom?
|
Like I say, it is all to do with probability. If, for example, you put Hydrogen, Oxygen, Carbon, Nitrogen, Sulphor, and Phosphorous (the basic elements necessary to produce life) and ran an electric current through it, then eventually, after a few million years or so, you would probably produce Life. Scientists, however, want this all to happen faster, so they have to make sure that the correct reaction occurs
first time, rather than going through lots of false starts, like it did in Nature. THAT is why they have to control everything. Clear?
:
|
Think about the different elements: iron, copper, chlorine, sodium, and radium. Compare the different characters of each. If you have a friend who works in chemistry, ask him about the difference in between each atom. See for yourself how a difference in one electron and proton can make a big difference. Could be done by non-intelligent power?
|
It wasn't "done" by a "power". It happened. If you examine the forces at work in the early Universe, you'll realise that it was, in fact, almost inevitable...
:
|
We stopped last at the very component of the matter, the atom and its component of electrons, protons, and neutrons. Now, we will examine something very large indeed, the Solar System. Look at the planets of the Solar System going around the sun. Earth, Venus, March, and the rest they go in circles around the sun. Very similar of what happens in the atom. In the atoms go in circles around the nucleus. We should stop here to think about what we see. The smallest is matching the largest. Isn’t that tell us about a one intelligent being that made both systems, and of course everything in between because everything in between is made of the atoms?
|
Lighter things will always tend to orbit around heavier things. I don't know what grades you claim to get in Physics, but judging by this, they weren't very high...
:
|
To made control of these powers in its smallest form.
|
Sorry to pick up on your poor grasp of the English Language again, but just look at this sentence!
:
|
Therefore, scientifically, in the very beginning there were nothing until the atom was made and this was the beginning of making of this world.
|
This shows two things: a poor understanding of the History of the Universe [which we already knew about] and the fact that you never read our evidence [which we'd guessed about]...
So there we go. Pinky's Marvellous Theory, dissected before your eyes...
