:
|
You quoted me, I have to assume you are directed towards me. Just because it is in one country it isn't genocide? What do you call the holocaust? Thats beside the point, as I don't think killing animals counts as genocide.
|
This is probably getting out of control, so I'm not going to say anything directly related to the topic, I'll just clarify this whole dog attack situation.
Skillyaslig said this:
:
|
Yep. Kids are little a***oles nowdays anyway. A good mauling from a dog is what they need.
|
I replied with this:
:
|
Oh, so it's fine for kids to be traumatised, but no, animal cruelty is strictly taboo. I think you need to sort out your priorities.
|
Daxter King said this:
:
|
How is a dog attack traumatizing? I was attacked by a dog and I still love mine. If a kid is being a prick then he deserves to be punished.
|
>>
Now to clear up something else.
:
|
You quoted me, I have to assume you are directed towards me.
|
I did quote you, because I was directly responding to your quote, thus responding to you, but I was using Skillyasligs post of "A good mauling" as the basis of what I said. So I was actually saying "being mauled by a dog would be traumatising" rather than "Being attacked by a dog would be traumatising". There is a difference, being mauled actually shows that there is damage being dealt, while a dog attack implies that someone was attacked by a dog, but does not directly state that they have sustained damage as a result of being attacked.