:
|
I hate it when people try and mix the words Arab and Muslim. It is a dishonest tactic to attempt to paint opponents of Islam as racists, when Islam is not a race, but a religion.
|
That's why I made the distinction between Arabs and Muslims and didn't use the word 'race'. In any case, the definition of 'racism' has loosened so that it can be used to describe discrimination against a religious or cultural group.
In any case, with the exception of your comment about the crusades, I don't strictly disagree with what you are saying. My point is that you really shouldn't tar
every member of a group with the same brush. Especially when you're using examples from a book as imprecisely translated as the Koran. The verse referring to wiping out the infidels can just as easily be translated to order preaching to them. Simililarly, the verse that suggests beating a rebellious wife can be translated as any of
"beat, hit, strike, scourge, chastise, flog, make an example of, spank, pet, tap and even seduce".
In addition, judging a religion by its text rather than its practise is only ever going to give you the wrong idea. The Old and New Testaments have similarly disgusting verses that are clear in their interpretation but are more or less ignored by scholars today. Things like beating a rebellious son and the capital punishment of burning (more precisely: pouring hot lead down the throat of the High Priest's daughter in the even of her being caught having an affair with a non-jew) were not even practised in ancient times.