That is a bloody lie. In slavery, many people gave up their hope to go on, because they were just treated so badly. Being beaten so badly before going to sleep is not something you would like, since the pain is so bad. Some people are even tramatized, like when I watched a show, a man was put in a jail cell after going through torture. He wakes up in the middle of the night with his hands bloody, not because of being beaten, but of his previous torture. He was scratching his skin off on the wall because he was scared the crap out of him. He would shake up and down, moaning, thinking that there was no chance of survival. So yeah, being beaten that badly is pretty much a bad punishment. Not going to stop them from acting out, but they sure will think twice.
:
Well, why not punish the rapist or murderer with the exact crime they committed? Sure, it lowers us to their level, but in my opinion, they deserve it for their crimes.
Besides, imprisoning them hardly ever works. A large percentage of rapists and murderers are either psychopaths or sociopaths, meaning that, even if they served their time, they're very likely to just repeat their crimes because they have no sense of right and wrong. So, why not just get rid of them? Is it really worth another person's life in the future to risk having them around?
|
Is it really worth anything when they are killed? Huh? Will the little girl forget everything about being abused? How about the family how have had some of their family killed? Will they see their relative again because the murderer died? No. Because it solves nothing but have 2 people gone from this world. There is no sasifaction afterwards. You would have to be sick if you were sasitified.
My grandmother tells me stories of people who have had their family members killed. They had their large family killed, and the people were looking for them. One of them took in her sisters' daughter, and another one. She did not go on thinking that she must raise the children to hate murderers. She left her country instead. Another women had her entire family killed, but yet she is one of the happiest people around. Why? Because she doesn't seek vengence. If one person is killed over an unforgiveble act, it just adds to the pile of people who were killed because of that. And like I said, no sasifaction. We would not feel any better.
Name me five murderers, who later repeated the same crime. Tell me, if your ratios are so true. And you lack to see the reason why the death penelty exists. It was created because the villages or counties had no space in their jails or did not have one at the time. So they got rid of them instead. But America does have a jail, and most of states think it is OK to kill the offenders off. So really, it doesn't make sense to have such a punishment.
To add something, not all people who are killed for those acts, haven't commited them. I remember someone who was executed, who admitted to someone that he was covering for his brother. His brother didn't want to receive the consquences, so he claimed that he did it, instead of his brother. Yeah, he was executed. So a man who did not deserve such a punishment, commited it. So is it really necessary to have a punishment?
What I am trying to say is that someone shouldn't also come with the dead person. It doesn't do anything really.
And about that thing with senseless killing, you probably shouldn't kill them, but you should at least escape. WIth a little violence, but no killing. Just wrong.