Indeed, and that’s precisely the admirable conservation work I was referencing. I suppose given the inability to straighten up the attitudes of near-sighted humans, relocation of the innocent was the best option.
Living in dangerous places is by no means limited to areas shared with dangerous animals. The Norfolk landscape is unfortunate enough to be inhabited by people who think they have the right to live at the coast, on a floodplain, or in fens, and then complain about coastal erosion, flooding or malaria. And so they plonk down concrete monstrosities and drain the marshes.
And then complain about dispaced coastal erosion and water shortages.
|