:
|
I'm against this, but i can understand why people are for it. As i've said before, i'm one of these people who sees in the 'long-term', so if in the short-term we have to use dubious methods that will benefit us in the long-term, i'm all for it.
I'm against it, however, 'cos it's not 'natural', and by that i mean we need disease. If we leapt around curing every disease known to man, as many want us to do, we'd be f*cking ourselves with a loaded gun. And frankly, it's something i don't want us to come to. We're doing a perfect job of ruining the World as it is, without hindering Mother Nature's efforts to stamp us out.
It also gets me when they try and cure disabilitating illnesses, they shouldn't. Everything that harms us keeps us in check, if we got rid of natural killers (Cancer et al) then we'd have to be even more reliant on the wars to keep our numbers low.
I hope humanity dies out soon.
|
Yes, but if we begin implementing stem cells into medical science, this could mean crushing every single disease that
hasn't happened yet.
And I'm sick of this 'it's not natural' slop. We're in the Information Age. If god made humans to be able to adapt to changing times, then stem cell research would just be the next step on the staircase.