"I'm more worried about exposing the world to these atrocities so the perpetrators are punished and the troops are brought home so shit like this doesn't again. But "we" have to stay so "we" don't "lose"."
So - in that case you'd quite happily massacre 100's of Troops who're only in Iraq because their superiors told them to go?
Don't be a moron, Statikk - are you saying that if it were a choice between the Coalition winning this war or the Muslim insurgents, you'd go with the latter choice because the Coalition have a few bad Apples? Whereas the Iraqi Muslim's are all a bit culturally retarded and crazy anyway?
I may be wrong in this - but i'm sure in World War 2 there was a limit to what the papers could report. Now, if WW2 happened today, and we had a mass of information saying how the British et al where treating the Nazis wrongly, do you think that'd help the cause? Would you defend the Nazis? We're doing the Insurgents propaganda for them - for free.
__________________
America: So soaked in Religion its seething with Sin.
"In Heaven all the interesting people are missing" - Friedrich Nietzsche
"America is the most grandiose experiment the world has seen, but, I am afraid, it is not going to be a success." - Sigmund Freud
|