Hmmm, interesting info from Havoc. I knew PETA were a bit, violent and extremist, but I didn' think it was to such a degree. If they're killing such a high portion of animals then whoever is in charge of PETA should take a look at what they're doing and set about righting it. But I still stand by my earleir comments, PETA have done good. OK maybe not as much good comapred to bad as I thuoght, but still, they have had success and fought for animal rights. Even if they've been hypocritical at times. Oh, I'm not sure what I think now. I know PETA have made mistakes, but they're campaigning for animal rights, even if possibly in the wrong way. It reminds me of the womens' rights campaigns, there were 2 groups: the NWUSS were peaceful and were mostly ignored, yet were more respected than the WSPU, who were violent and needlessly destructive. I think I'd class PETA in the middle.
And as for the 'animals used in life saving rug tests' thing, I still say: Test them on the criminals- the rapists, pedophiles and murderers. Screw any human rights thing for them. Once you break the laws of the land, you've violated others' rights. Therefore, you deserve no rights.
__________________
Fuzzle Guy: Apart from going swimming I've never been more wet in my life than when I went to see Take That.
|