[Munch's Master]

No loony-bin, it isn't case closed. I side with Used 100% here. PETA are for animal rights and animal wlfare. They don't neccessariyly want to ban pets if the pets are happy and wll treated. They don't want to bankrupt fast food companies (Although that's fine with me), they want to save animals. Many zoos keepo animals in tiny cages and poor conditions. Safari parks, while better, are still not the aimals' natural habitat. Its fine to keep near-extinct species in breeding shelters as long as they are good conditions, but in a lot of cases, who was it who nearly wiped out the animals? Humans. That's what PETA is about, righting the wrongs humans have done to animals. PETA may have euthanised animals, but in a lot of the cases where they've rescued animals, the animal's life isn't worth living. After all, would you rather live with no limbs or mangled limbs, damaged bones, malnutrition, mental trauma, no eyesight and goodnss knowswhat else some of those animals have suffered, or would you rather be quickly killed instead of suffering that existence. I'd pick the latter. And before you start with the generalizing, I am not a "hippy scumbag" nor am I "brainwashed". I make my own mind up in the world. Just because I and Used believe in animal welfare, doesn't mean we're zombified scumbag hippies.
That's another thing that pisses me off, generalizing. Although I think I mentioned that before.
Another thing that pisses me off is people who don't get their facts straight.
Another thing that pisses me off is false accuation in an arguement because the loser in the arugement can't get any better facts.

EDIT: Shouldn't this PETA discussion be in that 'Cruelty to Animals' thread or whatever it's called?