:
Ofcourse. It was never said that there is no such thing as animal rape. It was more of the point to show that rape is more of an exception then a standard.
But a zoophile, by definition, is someone who loves animals (Zoo - Animal. Phile - Love) and if someone then were to rape an animal, that wouldn't realy testify to love. So anyone raping an animal can't be called a zoophile in the first place. Their just animal abusers.
There just is one big diffrence between Zoophilia/bestiality and paedophilia. Bestiality has two sides. The loving side and the bad 'rape' side. Paedophilia only has one side.
You can't say; I did it because I loved the kid. That excuse MIGHT just go halfway if the 'victem' is above 15, as there are kids of that age that swear to love their much older lover. But in the end any sexual relation you have with a youngh child is taking advantage. Playing mindgames and the like. Even if the paedophile is absolutely certain he loves the child as any other would love an adult partner, then he should still have the ability to know that having sex with the child is taking it to far and that it is wrong. The fact that a lot of paedophiles don't understand or know that is IMO enough to qualify paedophilia as a mental disorder.
|
What I never seemed to bring into consideration was female zoophiles. I knew they existed, I just never thought about it. How could they possibley rape an animal? "Get your penis hard or I'll shoot you"? Hah. New viewpoint. Yay!
I never said that child abusers were okay to begin with, they are most definatley mentally deficient. New statement: Pedophiles and animal
rapists are somewhat mentally challenged.
:
|
Dino, I want you to do something. Prove that you don't find kids attrative. Fuucking prove it.
|
I'm liking your extremist views, but God dangit, that's just silly. Firstly, how can one prove he/she/it is not a paedophile over the internet? A picture of them having sex with a fully grown fe/male? Feh I say.
Secondly, Goatboy must have his say: Ahurhurhur.