:
|
Mojoman- Your insistence on being a good little leftist who will accept all differing ideas as long as they are in the middle ground has clouded your sight.
|
I'm not being an extreme leftist, I'm trying to analyze certain ideas instead of simply condeming them. If you've noticed some of my phrasing, there is to some extent devil's advocate at play here.
:
|
Do you honestly think that there is a percentage over 1 that feels sorry for the child after sitting there watching it get raped? THEY ENJOY IT.
|
If they're getting aroused by it, then yeah they enjoy it. My point was that it's not a stretch to think that despite their addiction to seeing it, they may not actually want to put a child through that kind of pain themselves. For some, it could be their way of getting it out of their system on a regular basis so that they don't have to commit the act themselves.
:
|
I want to point out one thing that you said that may actually beat Max for the dumbest thing I've ever seen on the internet. You said that kiddie porn being made legal would not significantly raise the amount of it being made.
|
I never stated that! Of course more people would make it! And I certainly don't think it should be legal. I was refering to the legalization of viewing it not making it. Considering that it's a powerful mental disorder, the people that would have the urge to jerk-off to it, probably already are. And no normal person would feel it as their chance to finally see some child porn, if it suddenly became legal to look at it, because most people couldn't even imagine watching it.
:
|
One-Yes it would. It would raise it a great a deal. There are pedos out there who may normally never indulge themselves because of fear of retribution. If we let them in the game then Yes, more will be made. 2-One is significant. One extra raped child is significant. We are not talking abstractions here. We are talking about innocent lives.
|
I agree completely, I'm not a fool.
:
|
But they are effectively hiring the paedophile if they pay for access to child porn. Even if the guy who made the footage lets it out for free, he's probably getting off on letting other people see his fetish, which could be seen as a sort of non-financial payment.
|
If the person is signing up for a website, paying the supplier to see it, that should be against the law. I'm sure it does give that person satisfaction, but to arrest the individuals for looking at it feels like a bit much to me.
Finally, I'd just like to say, since I never really gave my opinion earlier, I think it's highly acceptable for those parents to be outraged. In a job where the person is in such close contact with children, it's common sense to keep someone with the urge to have sex with them, far away. I don't want anyone to get the idea that I'm for such actions, because I'm not.
Damn... I'm done.