I know I wouldn't. I don't want children in the first place, but if I would then I would certainly not leave them under the care of a convicted sex offender.
I still keep with my point though, that you can't just generalize IMO. Just because you don't want to take the chance doesn't mean you immediatly need to portrait the man as some faul monster who should be tortured and stuff. Thats is also wrong IMO.
:
Consider this:
You find that paedophilia, the rape of a child, has mental deficiencies attached to the sexuality. If one was to have sex with an animal, it could never be consenusal. Ther4, rape.
The rape of an animal/The rape of a child. Ho hum.
|
Nope, have to disagree on a factual basis here. For one, what you just said is the most used argument against bestiality while comparing bestiality with pedophilia is downright non-sense.
Animals might not be able to verbaly tell you, but that doesn't mean they don't concent. Surely a dog would attack you if you did something it doesn't want? And don't even get me started on what a horse could do to you, if you even survive.
Anyway, I don't want to go to much off topic, but you might find
this and interesting read. Especialy the comparison to pedophilia, it's near the bottom.