View Single Post
  #34  
01-13-2006, 06:57 AM
OANST's Avatar
OANST
Necrum Burial Grounds Moderator
Our worst member ever
 
: Jun 2003
: Them dark fucking woods
: 12,320
Blog Entries: 134
Rep Power: 41
OANST  (16390)OANST  (16390)OANST  (16390)OANST  (16390)OANST  (16390)OANST  (16390)OANST  (16390)OANST  (16390)OANST  (16390)OANST  (16390)OANST  (16390)

Nate Dog Woof. The law that you spoke of that makes anyone who has ever been on the sex offendor list incapable of working with children is COMPLETELY the right thing to do. How can people not understand this? I'm not saying these people would EVER TOUCH A CHILD. I'm saying that I refuse to take that chance with my child. I will never claim to know the innocence or guilt of every person on this list or what their intentions are. All I know is that I WILL NOT TAKE THE CHANCE!

Mojoman- Your insistence on being a good little leftist who will accept all differing ideas as long as they are in the middle ground has clouded your sight. Do you honestly think that there is a percentage over 1 that feels sorry for the child after sitting there watching it get raped? THEY ENJOY IT. I want to point out one thing that you said that may actually beat Max for the dumbest thing I've ever seen on the internet. You said that kiddie porn being made legal would not significantly raise the amount of it being made. One-Yes it would. It would raise it a great a deal. There are pedos out there who may normally never indulge themselves because of fear of retribution. If we let them in the game then Yes, more will be made. 2-One is significant. One extra raped child is significant. We are not talking abstractions here. We are talking about innocent lives. Grow the fuuck up.
__________________


My bowels hurt.

Reply With Quote