hmm wrong topic for your second post Statikk...
Back on Topic:
For some it is a choice, others its it just the way they are.
In a way I think homosexuality is a result of human beings being too successful in the world (I mean the human race as a whole). In other words...not letting natural selection take place and allowing the weak to reproduce; therefore weakening our gene pool.
I know...this opinion is a contraversial one. And no I am not saying that in a 'natural' setting homosexuals wouldn't have less of a chance of survival, just they would get their genes spread about.
This thought of course suggests the homosexuality is not necessarily inherited.
Don't get me wrong, I would treat them as equals (though I have to edmit they do kind of creep me out with how some of them act, but I don't make fun of them for it).
Ok...really getting back on topic (sorry about that ramble). Syd's post about that study is an interesting one...the results of it does surprise me in a way.
Hmm considering what I said earlier here's another question I think this topic should address.
'Should homosexuals be allowed to have children through artifical means? (invitro, surrogate mothers, etc)'
I'd say...why not? If they what to experence the joys of having a child in that way all the power to them.
|