Oddworld games...The good...The bad....And the odd
Here is a topic at where you post the good,the bad,and the odd about all 4 games.
AO:
The good:
First game
difficulty=good
great storyline
You get hooked
Beutiful environments
possesion
The bad:
Not for the casual gamer
The puzzles may seem to confusing
Who wants to play as a skinny blue dude? (No offense but that is what I am hearing about this game as bad).
The odd:
Slugs with legs!!1 WTF!?
AE:
The good:
More music and a good selection too.
More possesing options
DRIPIK!
Hilarious cutscenes
More mud variety
Still has that good challenge
More creatures!
quicksave.
The bad:
Difficult but not as difficult as the first one.
Still not for a casual gamer.
You may get confused over the gamespeak.
Killing that one mud that stops you from getting 300 mud saves
Quicksaving just before you die.
The odd:
Getting killed by worms?
MO:
The good:
3-D
new hero
nice environments
Still funny
New slig gamespeak
The bad:
Graphics are a little crummy
Too cartoony
Seems like it's ment for a younger audience at some points
The odd:
little rabid furballs with teeth. Ahh the possibilities
SW:
The good:
1st to 3rd person view.
Great weapon variety
Badass main character
A whole new oddworld
The bad:
What!? NO abe or munch?
BOunty system doesen't last to long.
Short game
It just ain't odd
The odd:
Well the grubs are naked lizard men who can't speak a straight sentence.
|