:
|
Way to sensationalise.
These were voluntary stewards who were removing an audience member who were causing disruption. Pinning this on New Labour is rubbish, they didn't train the voluntary stewards, or tell them exactly how to act with 82 year olds. The stewards just did their jobs.
Can't believe how some people use this incident against Labour. Well, people will use anything.
"Police later used powers under the Terrorism Act to prevent Mr Wolfgang's re-entry, but he was not arrested."
This is the only bit I don't understand. Why didn't they just say, "You're not going in, you're being too disruptive. **** off."?
|
He wasn't being disruptive - in all previous labour party conferences, heckling was allowed and was rife. But on this particular occasion hecklers were removed for MINOR offenses.
The "voluntary" stewards ARE told at the beginning who to remove and why. Politicians who have been members of the Labour party since before Tony Blair was born do NOT come under the catagory of "who to remove" and simple internal disagreement heckling does NOT come under the catagory of "why".
This is being "used" because it SHOULD be used. It's a clear demonstration that the Labour party should not be trusted with Britain's future. The fact that they used anti-terrorism acts to stop him from going back in cements my case in that respect. These laws were not put in place to protect us from terrorism, but to oppress and control people the Labour party deems "disruptive".