I agree with Dino on this. I think that the sewards, despite being voluntary, could have listened to the guy next to the 82 year old, and treaed him more carefully due to his age. Also, you ca't say he is 'disruptive' just for voicing his opinion, even if it is against the majority and Jack straw. Plus, why bother removing the guy next to him just for agreeing? People have opinions that may in some cases be different to the opinions of those with greater political power, but they shouldn't be isolated and ignored for putting forward their views. This seems to me like any who disagree with Labour can now be labelled as terrorists, and I think Dino's right; this could sadly be the end of free speech and political beliefs, and Labour could become the modern version of fifteenth century Christianity- Preventing others of free speech and ideals. But that's just my opinion, for what it's worth.
__________________
Fuzzle Guy: Apart from going swimming I've never been more wet in my life than when I went to see Take That.
|